6702: Sanitize more data

[Gunde]

Sanitizing some data that wasn't sanitizes previously.

---

Progress

• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JMC-6702: Sanitize rule data

Reviewers

• Marcus Hirt (hirt - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc pull/58/head:pull/58
$ git checkout pull/58

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back hdafgard! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request.

[openjdk]

@Gunde This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. When the change also fulfills all project specific requirements, type /integrate in a new comment to proceed. After integration, the commit message will be:

6702: Sanitize more data

Reviewed-by: hirt

• If you would like to add a summary, use the /summary command.
• To credit additional contributors, use the /contributor command.
• To add additional solved issues, use the /solves command.

Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch. Since there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge master into your branch, and then specify the current head hash when integrating, like this: /integrate 9c2076cee7631b1de71173f2febf4b1343ff9085.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (62d939e)
• 00: Full (3f0990f)

[Gunde]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@Gunde
Pushed as commit 9c2076c.

[mlbridge]

Mailing list message from Henrik Dafgård on jmc-dev:

Changeset: 9c2076c
Author: Henrik Dafg?rd <hdafgard at openjdk.org>
Date: 2020-02-21 18:30:32 +0000
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/commit/9c2076ce

6702: Sanitize more data

Reviewed-by: hirt

! core/org.openjdk.jmc.common/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.common/pom.xml
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.common/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/common/util/FormatToolkit.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/general/ClassLeakingRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/general/DumpReasonRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/general/FlightRecordingSupportRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/latency/BiasedLockingRevocationRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/latency/JavaBlockingRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/latency/MethodProfilingRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/latency/VMOperationRule.java
! core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/memory/AutoBoxingRule.java
! core/tests/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk.test/src/test/resources/baseline/JfrRuleBaseline.xml

[ret2libc]

@Gunde Hi, does this need a CVE since it seems there were possible XSS? Thanks.