-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8150669: C1 intrinsic for Class.isPrimitive #37
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dongbohe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
/reviewer add phh |
@dongbohe Syntax:
|
/reviewer credit phh |
@dongbohe |
@dongbohe This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
@dongbohe This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the |
/open |
@dongbohe This pull request is now open |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm.
@dongbohe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Got the push approval. |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit eeef4de.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@phohensee @dongbohe Pushed as commit eeef4de. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi,
Please review this backport. The original purpose is to backport fix for JDK-8239477. But this depends on fix for JDK-8150669 & JDK-8233019.
Performed full jtreg test both on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu platforms.
This PR has been reviewed by Paul and approved before move to github: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2021-August/014155.html
Follow-up fix JDK-8233019 is planned to be backported as well.
(I made this PR on behalf of fyang)
Thanks,
hedongbo
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/37/head:pull/37
$ git checkout pull/37
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/37
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/37/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 37
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 37
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/37.diff