Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8267666: Add option to jcmd GC.heap_dump to use existing file #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

8267666: Add option to jcmd GC.heap_dump to use existing file #2

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

@RealCLanger RealCLanger commented Jul 13, 2021

Clean backport of this enhancement. CSR includes update releases.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8267666: Add option to jcmd GC.heap_dump to use existing file

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u pull/2/head:pull/2
$ git checkout pull/2

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u pull/2/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u/pull/2.diff

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 13, 2021

👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 7cbb67a3f8adc83a5b51c092a66480d7b22a6bea 8267666: Add option to jcmd GC.heap_dump to use existing file Jul 13, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2021

@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8267666: Add option to jcmd GC.heap_dump to use existing file

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 13, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Webrevs

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 23, 2021

Going to push as commit 9b6aa53.
Since your change was applied there have been 198 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 23, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 23, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 23, 2021

@RealCLanger Pushed as commit 9b6aa53.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant