Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8287292: Improve TransformKey to pack more kinds of transforms efficiently #8881

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

cl4es
Copy link
Member

@cl4es cl4es commented May 25, 2022

The bespoke caching scheme in jl.invoke.LambdaFormEditor.TransformKey allows keys to be compacted when all byte values of the key fit in 4 bits, otherwise a byte array is allocated and used. This means that all transforms with a kind value above 15 will be forced to allocate and use array comparisons.

Removing unused and folding some transforms to ensure all existing kinds can fit snugly within the 0-15 value range realize a minor improvement to footprint, speed and allocation pressure of affected transforms, e.g. ~300bytes/op reduction in the StringConcatFactoryBootstraps microbenchmark:

Baseline:

Benchmark                                                      Mode  Cnt     Score     Error   Units
SCFB.makeConcatWithConstants                                   avgt   15  2048.475 ?  69.887   ns/op
SCFB.makeConcatWithConstants:?gc.alloc.rate.norm               avgt   15  3487.311 ?  80.385    B/op

Patched:

Benchmark                                                      Mode  Cnt     Score     Error   Units
SCFB.makeConcatWithConstants                                   avgt   15  1961.985 ? 101.519   ns/op
SCFB.makeConcatWithConstants:?gc.alloc.rate.norm               avgt   15  3156.478 ? 183.600    B/op

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8287292: Improve TransformKey to pack more kinds of transforms efficiently

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8881/head:pull/8881
$ git checkout pull/8881

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/8881
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8881/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 8881

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 8881

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8881.diff

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 25, 2022

👋 Welcome back redestad! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@cl4es cl4es marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2022 09:41
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 25, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 25, 2022

@cl4es The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label May 25, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 25, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 25, 2022

@cl4es This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8287292: Improve TransformKey to pack more kinds of transforms efficiently

Reviewed-by: jlaskey, jvernee, mchung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 98 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 777f813: 8268422: Find a better way to select releases in "New API" page
  • 22e2067: 8282182: Document algorithm used to encode aarch64 logical immediate operands.
  • 37ecbb4: 8277420: Provide a way to copy the hyperlink to a doc element to the clipboard
  • 176bb23: 8287200: Test java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/VirtualThreadDeadlocks.java timed out after JDK-8287103
  • ec97da9: 8287352: DockerTestUtils::execute shows incorrect elapsed time
  • 140419f: 8286058: AArch64: clarify types of calls
  • 6a33974: 8286737: Test vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReference/weak006/weak006.java fails: Last soft reference has not been cleared
  • 295be6f: 8287285: Avoid redundant HashMap.containsKey call in java.util.zip.ZipFile.Source.get
  • 7cb368b: 8286709: (fc) FileChannel/FileChannelImpl cleanup
  • 7eb1559: 8286045: Use ForceGC for cleaner test cases
  • ... and 88 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/4587337e956ed6f1a59e9d980a09ab9f784fbde0...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 25, 2022
…a/lang/String/concat/ImplicitStringConcatShapes.java test failure)
Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a couple of suggestions.

@cl4es
Copy link
Member Author

cl4es commented May 27, 2022

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 27, 2022

Going to push as commit be93318.
Since your change was applied there have been 98 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 777f813: 8268422: Find a better way to select releases in "New API" page
  • 22e2067: 8282182: Document algorithm used to encode aarch64 logical immediate operands.
  • 37ecbb4: 8277420: Provide a way to copy the hyperlink to a doc element to the clipboard
  • 176bb23: 8287200: Test java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/VirtualThreadDeadlocks.java timed out after JDK-8287103
  • ec97da9: 8287352: DockerTestUtils::execute shows incorrect elapsed time
  • 140419f: 8286058: AArch64: clarify types of calls
  • 6a33974: 8286737: Test vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReference/weak006/weak006.java fails: Last soft reference has not been cleared
  • 295be6f: 8287285: Avoid redundant HashMap.containsKey call in java.util.zip.ZipFile.Source.get
  • 7cb368b: 8286709: (fc) FileChannel/FileChannelImpl cleanup
  • 7eb1559: 8286045: Use ForceGC for cleaner test cases
  • ... and 88 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/4587337e956ed6f1a59e9d980a09ab9f784fbde0...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 27, 2022

@cl4es Pushed as commit be93318.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants