8276266: Clean up incorrect client-libs ProblemList.txt entries

[prrace]

We have a few stale entries in the Problem list.
We need to remap some tests to still open bugs
7100044 -> 6849371
8203047 -> 8072110
8233703 -> 8238436
8273618 -> 8273617

We need to remove these FIXED bugs
java/awt/Choice/ChoiceKeyEventReaction/ChoiceKeyEventReaction.java 7185258 macosx-all

java/awt/GridLayout/LayoutExtraGaps/LayoutExtraGaps.java 8000171 windows-all
(actually closed as a dup of 8196100 which is fixed)

And this RESOLVED / not reproducible.
java/awt/SplashScreen/MultiResolutionSplash/MultiResolutionSplashTest.java 8061235 macosx-all

I've verified that the removed ones do pass in the CI test system so we should be OK unless they are very intermittent or environment specific

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 reviewer)

Issue

• JDK-8276266: Clean up incorrect client-libs ProblemList.txt entries

Reviewers

• Alexander Zuev (@azuev-java - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6203/head:pull/6203
$ git checkout pull/6203

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6203
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6203/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6203

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6203

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6203.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@prrace To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[prrace]

/label client

[openjdk]

@prrace
The client label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (0fa362a2)
• 00: Full (11979ea9)

[mrserb]

I am not sure why the macOS-specific JDK-8203047 was closed as a duplicate of x11 specific JDK-8072110?
The HandleExceptionOnEDT from the JDK-8203047 is not even mentioned in the JDK-8072110.

[prrace]

I am not sure why the macOS-specific JDK-8203047 was closed as a duplicate of x11 specific JDK-8072110?
The HandleExceptionOnEDT from the JDK-8203047 is not even mentioned in the JDK-8072110.

I don't know. This was done by @prsadhuk - Prasanta can you explain that ?

[bridgekeeper]

@prrace This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[mrserb]

Any updates on that @prrace @prsadhuk?

[bridgekeeper]

@prrace This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[bridgekeeper]

@prrace This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

[prrace]

/open

[prrace]

@prsadhuk - still looking for a response from you.

[openjdk]

@prrace This pull request is now open

[prsadhuk]

I am not sure why the macOS-specific JDK-8203047 was closed as a duplicate of x11 specific JDK-8072110?
The HandleExceptionOnEDT from the JDK-8203047 is not even mentioned in the JDK-8072110.

I don't know. This was done by @prsadhuk - Prasanta can you explain that ?

I am not sure on this now...Seems like it might have been a mistake seeing it now..probably I was trying to close as dup with some other JBS but inadvertently mentioned the wrong one..

[azuev-java]

Looks good.

[openjdk]

@prrace this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout pl_cleanup
git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push