8268077: java.util.List missing from Collections Framework Overview

[rgiulietti]

Trivial changes to this non-normative document.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8268077: java.util.List missing from Collections Framework Overview

Reviewers

• Stuart Marks (@stuart-marks - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4289/head:pull/4289
$ git checkout pull/4289

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4289
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4289/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4289

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4289

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4289.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back rgiulietti! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@rgiulietti The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (f557d775)

[stuart-marks]

Looks good. Thanks for noticing and fixing this!

[openjdk]

@rgiulietti This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8268077: java.util.List missing from Collections Framework Overview

Reviewed-by: smarks

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 47 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 29ab162: 8266257: Fix foreign linker build issues for ppc and s390
• c8f4c02: 8268118: Rename bytes_os_cpu.inline.hpp files to bytes_os_cpu.hpp
• 1296a6c: 8268119: Rename copy_os_cpu.inline.hpp files to copy_os_cpu.hpp
• 1783437: 8264975: java/net/DatagramSocket/DatagramSocketMulticasting.java fails infrequently
• a52a08d: 8267916: Adopt cast notation for CompilerThread conversions
• 9bf347b: 8226362: langtools ProblemList file contains more than 1 entry for a test
• bdeaeb4: 8240256: Better resource cleaning for SunPKCS11 Provider
• 06f87cf: 8266337: ThreadTimesClosure doesn't handle exceptions properly
• ef01e47: 8268150: tier2: test/jdk/tools/jpackage/junit/junit.java needs updating for jtreg 6
• e9f3e32: 8259530: Generated docs contain MIT/GPL-licenced works without reproducing the licence
• ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/b17b11eb178d7aab84517771e5afc03b40095cd0...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@stuart-marks) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[rgiulietti]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@rgiulietti
Your change (at version f557d77) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[stuart-marks]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

@stuart-marks @rgiulietti Since your change was applied there have been 52 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3aa7062: 8262409: sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketImplThrowsWrongExceptions. SSL test failures caused by java failed with "Server reported the wrong exception"
• 5982cfc: 8266317: Vector API enhancements
• eb385c0: 8268167: MultipleLogins.java failure on macosx-aarch64
• fbaebd4: 8268014: Build failure on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11.4 (s390x) due to 'SYS_get_mempolicy' was not declared
• 338dae4: 8268133: Update java/net/Authenticator tests to eliminate dependency on sun.net.www.MessageHeader and some other internal APIs
• 29ab162: 8266257: Fix foreign linker build issues for ppc and s390
• c8f4c02: 8268118: Rename bytes_os_cpu.inline.hpp files to bytes_os_cpu.hpp
• 1296a6c: 8268119: Rename copy_os_cpu.inline.hpp files to copy_os_cpu.hpp
• 1783437: 8264975: java/net/DatagramSocket/DatagramSocketMulticasting.java fails infrequently
• a52a08d: 8267916: Adopt cast notation for CompilerThread conversions
• ... and 42 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/b17b11eb178d7aab84517771e5afc03b40095cd0...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 5405f98.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.