-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8252001: remove usage of PropertyResolvingWrapper in vmTestbase/nsk/jdi #379
Conversation
👋 Welcome back iignatyev! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. In the future I would like to see something like this broken up so as to not mix the smaller changes in with the massive repetitive changes.
@iignatev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for more details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 42 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
thanks, Chris. unfortunately, most of the changes here weren't self-sufficient or meaningful on their own, so they couldn't be (easily?) broken up. you could have though reviewed the patch as if it were broken up by reviewing each particular commit separately. |
Igor,
The EventTestTemplates$StressTestTemplate is replaced with StressTestTemplate in the comment. |
@sspitsyn , I just The discrepancy b/w comments and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@iignatev
Thank you for explanation and filing a new bug.
I'm okay with this update.
for the record, the RFE to clean up the comments -- 8253864 |
/integrate |
@iignatev Since your change was applied there have been 54 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 8f7c9a7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
could you please review the patch which removes
PropertyResolvingWrapper
fromvmTestbase/nsk/jdi
? other than the removal ofPropertyResolvingWrapper
from jtreg actions, the patch alsos/"-debugee.vmkeys=/-debugee.vmkeys="/
ExecDriver
there it's not needed anymoreEventTestTemplates
s inner classes were moved up and the tests were updated accordingly-cp
in the tests which specify classpath, otherwise, these tests fail due to CNFE of jtreg tests"
on windows innsk.share.jdi.Binder
"
) w/\0
inn.s.j.Binder
so there will be no clashes w/"
from actionstesting: ✅
vmTestbase/nsk/jdi
tests on{linux,windows,macos}-x64
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/379/head:pull/379
$ git checkout pull/379