-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8257079: ZGC: Fold ZMark::prepare_mark() into ZMark::start() #1433
Conversation
👋 Welcome back pliden! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@pliden This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for reviewing! /integrate |
@pliden Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit f3fc0e0. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Since we no longer have STW roots, ZMark::start() is now just calls perpare_mark() (and does verification), so we can just as well fold perpare_mark() into start().
Progress
Testing
Failed test tasks
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1433/head:pull/1433
$ git checkout pull/1433