Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8257079: ZGC: Fold ZMark::prepare_mark() into ZMark::start() #1433

Closed

Conversation

pliden
Copy link
Contributor

@pliden pliden commented Nov 25, 2020

Since we no longer have STW roots, ZMark::start() is now just calls perpare_mark() (and does verification), so we can just as well fold perpare_mark() into start().


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Linux x86 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ❌ (6/6 failed) ❌ (2/2 failed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)

Failed test tasks

Issue

  • JDK-8257079: ZGC: Fold ZMark::prepare_mark() into ZMark::start()

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1433/head:pull/1433
$ git checkout pull/1433

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 25, 2020

👋 Welcome back pliden! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 25, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2020

@pliden The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 25, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 25, 2020

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2020

@pliden This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8257079: ZGC: Fold ZMark::prepare_mark() into ZMark::start()

Reviewed-by: stefank, ayang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 461c5fc: 8256450: Add gz option to jmap to write a gzipped heap dump
  • dee79d6: 8253936: Replace ... with {@code ...} for java.sql
  • cfb175d: 8256508: Improve CompileCommand flag
  • 7aed9b6: 8256016: Dacapo24H.java failed with "assert(false) failed: unscheduable graph"
  • 26e6cb3: 8256489: Make gtest for long path names on Windows more resilient in the presence of virus scanners
  • 911f16d: 8257056: Submit workflow should apt-get update to avoid package installation errors
  • b0bd0c2: 8256755: Update build.tools.depend.Depend to handle record components in API signatures
  • 9aeadbb: 8256865: Foreign Memory Access and Linker API are missing NPE checks
  • 8cd2e0f: 8243315: ParallelScavengeHeap::initialize() passes GenAlignment as page size to os::trace_page_sizes instead of actual page size
  • cdb41ba: 8255904: Remove superfluous use of reflection in Class::isRecord
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0d91f0a1df2dbb484e964efa4f1a9500eab799fe...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 25, 2020
@pliden
Copy link
Contributor Author

pliden commented Nov 25, 2020

Thanks for reviewing!

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 25, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 25, 2020
@pliden pliden deleted the 8257079_fold_prepare_mark_into_start branch November 25, 2020 20:11
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2020

@pliden Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a14f02d: 8256267: Relax compiler/floatingpoint/NaNTest.java for x86_32 and lower -XX:+UseSSE
  • 7c73fff: 8256486: Linux/Windows-x86 builds broken after JDK-8254231
  • 461c5fc: 8256450: Add gz option to jmap to write a gzipped heap dump
  • dee79d6: 8253936: Replace ... with {@code ...} for java.sql
  • cfb175d: 8256508: Improve CompileCommand flag
  • 7aed9b6: 8256016: Dacapo24H.java failed with "assert(false) failed: unscheduable graph"
  • 26e6cb3: 8256489: Make gtest for long path names on Windows more resilient in the presence of virus scanners
  • 911f16d: 8257056: Submit workflow should apt-get update to avoid package installation errors
  • b0bd0c2: 8256755: Update build.tools.depend.Depend to handle record components in API signatures
  • 9aeadbb: 8256865: Foreign Memory Access and Linker API are missing NPE checks
  • ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0d91f0a1df2dbb484e964efa4f1a9500eab799fe...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit f3fc0e0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

openjdk-notifier bot referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants